90233050HU vs 9025121796 — Compare
Martin MAC Viper Wash Luminare W/ CMY Color Mixing vs Martin ERA 400 Performance Cold LED CMY Color Mixing Light
The Martin MAC Viper Wash is a high-output CMY wash fixture built on traditional lamp technology, delivering 33,000 lumens with uniform field coverage across a wide zoom range—ideal for touring shows and large venues needing broad wash light. The Martin ERA 400 Performance Cold LED is a compact LED moving light with 10,000 lumens, extensive gobo options, framing blades, and a prism for precise beam shaping and effects—better suited to theaters, concert stages, and productions requiring creative gobos and pixel-level beam control.
No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.
Martin MAC Viper Wash Luminare W/ CMY Color Mixing
Martin ERA 400 Performance Cold LED CMY Color Mixing Light
Specs side by side
| Martin MAC Viper Wash Luminare W/ CMY Color Mixing | Martin ERA 400 Performance Cold LED CMY Color Mixing Light | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9,410.58 | $8,676.00 |
| Brand | Martin | Martin |
| Year | Unknown | Unknown |
| Condition | New | New |
Why choose Martin MAC Viper Wash Luminare W/ CMY Color Mixing
- ✓ Significantly higher output at 33,000 lumens for large-scale wash coverage
- ✓ Uniform beam with minimal color shift across entire zoom range
- ✓ Linear CTO control enables smooth daylight-to-tungsten color temperature transitions
- ✓ Compact footprint (473mm × 732mm) practical for touring setups
Why choose Martin ERA 400 Performance Cold LED CMY Color Mixing Light
- ✓ LED technology eliminates lamp replacement and reduces power consumption
- ✓ Extensive gobo library with seven rotating/indexing and nine static options for creative content
- ✓ Motorized framing module with four individually controllable blades for precise beam masking
- ✓ Rotating three-facet prism adds dynamic effects and visual complexity
Frequently asked questions
Which fixture is better for broad stage washing versus detailed beam work?
The MAC Viper Wash excels at high-intensity, uniform field wash coverage across large stages due to its 33,000-lumen output and consistent beam from tight to wide zoom. The ERA 400 is engineered for precise beam control with gobos, framing blades, and a prism, making it ideal for detailed lighting design in theaters and concert productions where creative shaping matters more than raw wash power.
What are the maintenance and operational cost differences?
The MAC Viper Wash uses a 1000-watt lamp requiring periodic replacement and higher energy consumption. The ERA 400 uses a 300W LED engine with no consumable lamps, lower electricity draw, and minimal maintenance—a significant long-term cost advantage for installations or touring with many show days.
Which has better color control and mixing capability?
Both feature CMY color mixing systems. The MAC Viper Wash emphasizes color saturation and stability with linear CTO for temperature shifts; the ERA 400 adds nine built-in color filters plus open for preset options alongside CMY mixing. For continuous, smooth color transitions, the MAC Viper's CTO is more practical; for quick preset selections, the ERA 400's filter bank adds convenience.
Which is more suitable for touring versus permanent installation?
The MAC Viper Wash's 33 kg weight and compact width make it practical for touring rigs requiring high output in tight spaces. The ERA 400's 22.5 kg, LED efficiency, and lack of lamp replacement make it excellent for both touring and permanent venues where electrical savings and gobo/effect capabilities drive the choice.