DBXDI1 vs DBXRTA-M — Compare

dbx Di1 Active Direct Box vs dbx RTA-M Reference Microphone

The dbx Di1 is a direct box for converting instrument-level signals (bass, keyboards, guitars) to line level for mixing consoles; the dbx RTA-M is a condenser microphone for capturing acoustic sources and room measurement. Choose the Di1 if you're plugging instruments directly into a console; choose the RTA-M if you need to mic vocals, drums, or instruments acoustically.

No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.

dbx Di1 Active Direct Box

$195.00
View dbx Di1 Active Direct Box

dbx RTA-M Reference Microphone

$150.62
View dbx RTA-M Reference Microphone

Specs side by side

dbx Di1 Active Direct Boxdbx RTA-M Reference Microphone
Price$195.00$150.62
BrandDBXDBX
YearUnknownUnknown
ConditionNewNew

Why choose dbx Di1 Active Direct Box

  • Converts instrument signals to balanced XLR without preamp noise
  • Dual outputs for simultaneous console and amp feeding
  • Transparent tone control with vintage warmth and punchy clarity options
  • Works equally well in live and studio environments

Why choose dbx RTA-M Reference Microphone

  • Omnidirectional condenser captures full frequency range (20 Hz–20 kHz)
  • Midrange presence peak cuts through dense mixes naturally
  • Rugged metal construction withstands touring and studio use
  • Accurate for both recording and acoustic room measurement
Bottom line: Buy the Di1 if you're routing instruments directly into a mixing console or audio interface. Buy the RTA-M if you need to mic acoustic sources like vocals, drums, or instruments in a room.

Frequently asked questions

Can I use these together?

Yes. Use the Di1 to convert a bass or keyboard's unbalanced output to balanced XLR, then send that balanced signal to a microphone preamp input. The RTA-M would then serve as a separate microphone for capturing other sources.

Which is better for beginners?

The Di1 is simpler conceptually—plug an instrument in, get a balanced output. The RTA-M requires basic microphone technique (placement, polar pattern awareness) and phantom power, making it slightly more technical for complete beginners.

Do I need both for home recording?

Not necessarily. If you're recording DI instruments (bass, synth, electric guitar), the Di1 alone suffices. If you're recording vocals or acoustic instruments, the RTA-M is what you need. Many home studios use both for maximum flexibility.

Which handles live performance better?

Both are live-rated. The Di1 excels at sending keyboard or bass to a mixing console reliably. The RTA-M works for live vocal or acoustic miking but requires stable phantom power and careful mic placement; the Di1 is more plug-and-play for instrument feeds.

🎸

Welcome! Before we chat…

Drop your name and email so we can follow up if you reach us after hours.

We never share your info.

🟢 Specialist connected