MAR-90250300HU vs MAR-90290010 — Compare
Martin Mac Viper Xip In Cardboard vs Martin ERA 700 Peformance IP
The Martin MAC Viper XIP delivers superior brightness (28,000 vs 26,000 lumens) and a tighter zoom ratio for precision spotting in large touring rigs, while the ERA 700 Performance IP offers better environmental resilience (IP66 plus active humidity control and C5M marine protection) and lighter weight for frequent repositioning in outdoor and coastal venues. Choose the Viper XIP for maximum output and beam control; choose the ERA 700 for durability in salt spray and extreme temperature swings.
No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.
Specs side by side
| Martin Mac Viper Xip In Cardboard | Martin ERA 700 Peformance IP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $14,999.00 | $14,899.50 |
| Brand | Martin | Martin |
| Fixture Type | Moving Head | Moving Head |
| Condition | New | New |
Why choose Martin Mac Viper Xip In Cardboard
- ✓ Higher light output at 28,000 lumens with 2.4 Mcd peak intensity for long-throw applications
- ✓ Wider zoom range (5.7° to 54°) enables tighter spotting and broader coverage from one position
- ✓ NFC smartphone control and wireless DMX module slot for faster on-set configuration
- ✓ IP65 environmental sealing with 50,000+ hour LED lifespan for extended tour schedules
Why choose Martin ERA 700 Peformance IP
- ✓ Superior environmental protection: IP66 rating plus C5M marine-grade corrosion resistance for coastal and outdoor festivals
- ✓ Active humidity control system maintains reliability in extreme temperature range (-20°C to +40°C)
- ✓ Lighter and more compact (under 40 kg, 759 mm height) for easier rig setup and repositioning
- ✓ Full framing system with four independently controllable blades plus dual prisms for advanced beam shaping
Frequently asked questions
Which fixture is better for outdoor festival use in coastal areas?
The ERA 700 Performance IP is purpose-built for harsh environments: it carries IP66 rating and C5M marine-grade salinity protection, while the Viper XIP's IP65 rating is sufficient for moisture but not optimized against salt spray. The ERA 700's active humidity control also defends against condensation in temperature swings common at outdoor festivals.
Which produces a tighter, more focused beam for long-throw spotting?
The MAC Viper XIP has the tighter minimum beam angle (5.7° vs 5.4°) and higher peak intensity (2.4 Mcd), plus it generates 2,000 more lumens overall, making it superior for precision spotting at distance. The ERA 700's wider zoom range (5.4° to 44° vs 5.7° to 54°) is narrower at both ends.
Which is easier to move around during setup and teardown?
The ERA 700 Performance IP weighs under 40 kg and is only 759 mm tall, making it significantly lighter and more compact for frequent repositioning. The Viper XIP is described as compact but no weight is specified; the ERA 700's lighter construction is a practical advantage in fast-turnaround touring.
What is the main difference in color temperature and rendering?
The Viper XIP outputs 28,000 lumens at 5800 K with a ±250 K tolerance, while the ERA 700 delivers 26,000 lumens at 6500 K with CRI 90 color rendering. The ERA 700's higher CRI (90) ensures more accurate color reproduction; the Viper XIP's 5800 K is slightly warmer. Both are professional-grade, so choice depends on your show's lighting design temperature preference.