AMX-CCC013 vs FG2102-08-W — Compare

AMX MU-1300 AMX MUSE Controller with 2 Serial, 2 IR, 4 IO vs AMX MCP-108-WH Massio™ 8-Button ControlPad - White

The MU-1300 is a rack-mount control processor for backend system integration with multi-protocol device management, while the MCP-108-WH is a wall-mounted user interface for end-user control in networked AV environments. Choose the MU-1300 if you're building complex automation logic across serial, IR, and I/O networks; choose the MCP-108-WH if you need a touchpoint for conference rooms, smart buildings, or other spaces where operators interact directly with the system.

No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.

AMX MU-1300 AMX MUSE Controller with 2 Serial, 2 IR, 4 IO

$1,263.00
View AMX MU-1300 AMX MUSE Controller with 2 Serial, 2 IR, 4 IO

AMX MCP-108-WH Massio™ 8-Button ControlPad - White

$1,202.00
View AMX MCP-108-WH Massio™ 8-Button ControlPad - White

Specs side by side

AMX MU-1300 AMX MUSE Controller with 2 Serial, 2 IR, 4 IOAMX MCP-108-WH Massio™ 8-Button ControlPad - White
Price$1,263.00$1,202.00
BrandAMXAMX
ConditionNewNew

Why choose AMX MU-1300 AMX MUSE Controller with 2 Serial, 2 IR, 4 IO

  • Dual serial ports plus dual IR ports support complex multi-device control chains
  • Linux-based processing runs sophisticated automation scripts without external CPU
  • Compact 1 RU rack form factor designed for equipment closets and central control hubs
  • Per-port activity LEDs and programmable status indicators aid troubleshooting during setup

Why choose AMX MCP-108-WH Massio™ 8-Button ControlPad - White

  • Wall-mounted form factor positions control at point of use rather than in a rack
  • Single Ethernet cable with PoE eliminates separate power infrastructure
  • Integrated NetLinx processor handles common control tasks without external hardware
  • Eight buttons plus volume knob provide intuitive hands-on interface for end users
Bottom line: Install integrators building centralized automation systems should select the MU-1300; facilities deploying user-facing room controls should choose the MCP-108-WH. Both are professional-grade, but they serve opposite ends of the system architecture.

Frequently asked questions

Can these two units work together?

Yes. The MU-1300 could serve as the backend control processor while the MCP-108-WH acts as a wall interface, communicating over Ethernet. The MU-1300 would execute the automation logic and the MCP-108-WH would provide user interaction points.

Which is better for a small conference room?

The MCP-108-WH is purpose-built for this application—it mounts to the wall, draws power over one cable, and offers buttons and a volume knob for users to control AV systems. The MU-1300 belongs in a central rack.

What protocols does each support?

The MU-1300 excels at serial (RS-232/422/485), IR, and digital I/O bridging across multiple devices simultaneously. The MCP-108-WH integrates NetLinx control with Ethernet, RS-232, IR, and relay/I/O but is designed as a single control surface, not a multi-device hub.

Which requires more setup?

The MU-1300 demands script programming and multi-protocol configuration by integrators. The MCP-108-WH is simpler—it connects via one Ethernet cable, receives PoE power, and buttons are programmed through the NetLinx control layer, often as part of a larger system design.

🎸

Welcome! Before we chat…

Drop your name and email so we can follow up if you reach us after hours.

We never share your info.

🟢 Specialist connected