FG1061-08-FX vs FG1061-16-FX — Compare
AMX DGX800-ENC Enova DGX 800 Enclosure vs AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure
The DGX 800 is a compact 8x8 matrix switcher ideal for mid-size installations and live venues, while the DGX 1600 is a larger 16x16 matrix built for enterprise-scale facilities and broadcast environments. Choose the 800 for flexibility and space efficiency; choose the 1600 for maximum I/O capacity and distributed signal transmission across large buildings.
No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.
Specs side by side
| AMX DGX800-ENC Enova DGX 800 Enclosure | AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $16,115.00 | $17,515.00 |
| Brand | AMX | AMX |
| Condition | New | New |
Why choose AMX DGX800-ENC Enova DGX 800 Enclosure
- ✓ Compact 4 RU form factor fits space-constrained racks and mobile rigs
- ✓ 8x8 matrix sufficient for most live performance and mid-size venue routing needs
- ✓ Lower cost entry point for professional installations without oversized I/O
- ✓ Modular design lets you pay only for I/O connections you actually use
Why choose AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure
- ✓ 16x16 matrix handles large broadcast and enterprise conferencing deployments
- ✓ Extended fiber transmission up to 10 kilometers enables facility-wide distribution
- ✓ Integrated redundant power and hot-swap modules eliminate single points of failure
- ✓ Designed specifically for mission-critical large-scale installations
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference in matrix size?
The DGX 800 supports up to 8x8 matrix switching, while the DGX 1600 supports 16x16. The 1600 has twice the simultaneous input and output routing capacity.
Can I transmit video over long distances with either unit?
Both support fiber transmission. The DGX 1600 specifically offers extended reach up to 10 kilometers over single-mode fiber and 300 meters over multimode fiber, making it better for large facilities. The DGX 800 specifications do not detail distance capabilities.
Which is better for touring live sound?
The DGX 800 is better suited for touring because of its compact 4 RU size and lower weight, making it easier to transport and fit in mobile rack systems while still providing professional-grade routing.
Do both have integrated control?
Yes, both include an integrated NetLinx NX Controller for system logic and automation. The DGX 1600 emphasizes built-in redundancy and management features for mission-critical continuous operation.