FG1061-16-FX vs FG1061-32-FX — Compare
AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure vs AMX DGX3200-ENC Enova DGX 3200 Enclosure
The DGX1600 is a 16x16 matrix switcher suited for mid-to-large enterprise installations, while the DGX3200 is a 32x32 matrix switcher designed for complex, multi-zone facilities requiring higher bandwidth and more simultaneous routing. Choose the DGX1600 for standard large-scale corporate or broadcast setups; choose the DGX3200 for sprawling venues, educational campuses, or installations demanding extensive source-to-display distribution.
No sales tax on orders shipped outside California — total cost beats national retailers that charge sales tax in nearly every state.
Specs side by side
| AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure | AMX DGX3200-ENC Enova DGX 3200 Enclosure | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $17,515.00 | $31,980.00 |
| Brand | AMX | AMX |
| Condition | New | New |
Why choose AMX DGX1600-ENC Enova DGX 1600 Enclosure
- ✓ Lower cost entry point for professional AV matrix switching
- ✓ Sufficient 16x16 configuration for most enterprise conferencing and live event setups
- ✓ Integrated NetLinx NX Controller with redundant power in compact chassis
- ✓ Supports 4K/UHD and extended fiber runs up to 10 km on single-mode
Why choose AMX DGX3200-ENC Enova DGX 3200 Enclosure
- ✓ Double the matrix capacity at 32x32 for complex multi-zone installations
- ✓ Eight input and eight output board slots versus four each on DGX1600
- ✓ Handles more simultaneous 4K feeds and display outputs in large facilities
- ✓ Future-proof for high-bandwidth educational and corporate campuses
Frequently asked questions
What is the main technical difference between these two models?
The DGX1600 supports a maximum 16x16 matrix configuration with four input and four output board slots, while the DGX3200 supports 32x32 matrix switching with eight input and eight output board slots. This means the DGX3200 can route twice as many simultaneous sources to displays and handle more complex facility layouts.
Which is better for a large university campus?
The DGX3200 is better suited for campus-wide applications because it accommodates more input/output combinations across multiple buildings and departments, supporting centralized switching with distributed displays. The DGX1600 works well for single large facilities like a conference center or auditorium.
Do both support 4K and fiber connectivity over long distances?
Yes, both models support 4K and UHD content, and both offer fiber connectivity up to 10 km on single-mode fiber and 300 meters on multimode fiber. The key difference is raw switching capacity, not signal quality or distance capabilities.
Are these suitable for small installations?
No, both are professional enterprise-grade systems designed for large-scale installations. Neither is recommended for single-room applications, small studios, or home theater use.